26 Comments
User's avatar
Armand Beede's avatar

CellyBlue: The surprise in here was to find a group that misuses the name of Frederick Douglass, but whose mission is "the sanctity of free market and limited government".

The SANCTITY of free market.

Is THAT what Frederick Douglass was about?!

Whew, now THAT IS a reinterpretation of history!

Expand full comment
Carol L. Clark's avatar

At over 900 pages, it is unlikely that most Americans will read Project 2025. But there are commentators online and in other media that will give you a rundown of just how this document will hurt every member of every family in America that is not in the top 10%. From women's rights to worker's protections and rights to tax policy to the turfing out of career civil servants who are hired and retained for the expertise and training. In their place? Flunkies loyal to Trump, who is mentioned 312 times in the document, or, on average, every third page. Practically speaking, all of your rights under the Constitution are gone. PFFT, just like that on day one, day 1000, day 10,000.

Expand full comment
C. Elyse's avatar

Yes, they started chipping away at civil rights the same day Title VII passed legislation!

Expand full comment
DR. Maxson's avatar

Don't u mean title 9. Why is it that seemingly all Democrat women have thrown women under the bus in favor of supporting bitter,unathletic, sissy men posing as women so they can win a trophy competing against real women

Expand full comment
C. Elyse's avatar

No, I intended Title VII because I’m fully aware that but for the efforts of organized BLACK women, the entire Civil Rights Movement would still be at the starting line. That said, I haven’t thrown anyone anywhere, rather you’ve taken time to imply that you know me intimately, so well you can assume my political affiliation. A better question is do you really want to demonstrate how women behave to attain the (virtual) male gaze?

Expand full comment
m e lennon's avatar

amazed at the choice of names of these foundations ~ the kool aid must help wet their furious appetite.

Expand full comment
katsden's avatar

reminds me of reagan’s era, the inverted naming of bills. example: “healthy forests initiative” actually advocated Clear Cuts : leaving entire swaths of hillsides barren.

Expand full comment
DR. Maxson's avatar

Controlled burns and such are known as proper forest management. Decreasing the amount of and damage done to the forest and it's creatures by forest fires. Something Dems have largely done away with in an effort to use the increasing loss of life and damage in their climate change false narrative.

Expand full comment
Kali Higgins's avatar

Coalition? Hmmm, doesn’t sound like the correct word.

Expand full comment
Taras Michael Stratelak's avatar

Now we have a comprehensive list of organizations that are enemies of We the People. Good job!

Expand full comment
pa changa's avatar

We're they all started as a way to bring in $ and grift?

Expand full comment
Ladonna's avatar

Thanks! I never knew there were SO MANY. This should be publicized much more so people belonging in these supporter cults can be called out. And I think some of them are a little sorry now, especially when the see how many WHITE people and their own members are also being really hurt.

Expand full comment
DR. Maxson's avatar

The title of this article should be, "The biased and ignorant writer and her ignorites bash Trump for a 900 hundred page document he didn't write and doesn't endorse. While ignoring the document that he did write and does endorse that details his plan for America...It's called" Trump 47". Just in case anyone of you want to be able to speak intelligently on the subject instead of letting cellyblue do your thinking for you

Expand full comment
CellyBlue - I Do Know This!'s avatar

😂😂😂😂😂

Expand full comment
Squilon's avatar

Lol, typo in the post title. No shame indeed.

Expand full comment
DannyAC30's avatar

🤬

Expand full comment
Darrell P Baker's avatar

First, I don't care who supports something I don't. This list is meaningless, which leads to the project being meaningless. Which begs the question, what is your point of being meaningless, an ulterior motive just as meaningless? Just sayin' and a askin'.

Expand full comment
Judi O'Neil's avatar

Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

Expand full comment
Elayne McKenna's avatar

I’m impressed (negatively not positively) that there are so many misogynistic and racist wannabe fascists around to be able to form so many weird organizations. Fortunately for the rest of us the truth about Project 2025 and its developers has become common knowledge. Vote people…our safety and lives depend upon it!

Expand full comment
DR. Maxson's avatar

Trump didn't write, hasn't read and doesn't support this political red herring designed to malign him. But that doesn't matter to you does it. Have you read Trump 47? The plan he wrote and endorses.if you have to lie about and deliberately mislead people in order to have a chance at beating him ...maybe your on the wrong side of the argument

Expand full comment
Elayne McKenna's avatar

I don’t believe for a minute that trump doesn’t know what’s in Project 2025. Many of his cronies have been instrumental in its evolution. If you don’t realize he’s a liar and a criminal (in fact a convicted felon) then you’re living in a cult generated world. Good luck with that…

Expand full comment
Bliss Grey's avatar

Thank you .

Expand full comment
Michael Anthony Valente's avatar

Excellent.

Expand full comment
John Wolff's avatar

Thanks so much for this list; I think I will frame it, and also disseminate it.

Expand full comment